By: Sociologist Kelly J. Pottella G.
The constant external economic and political aggression has forged an unbreakable unity around peace in Venezuela. Our loyalty is not a blind allegiance to a single figure, but a commitment to the dignity of not being subdued by a foreign power. When the U.S. threatens, it does not see a regime; it sees a Nation. The only possible cultural and political response is unified resistance. We observe with deep concern the fate of other nations "liberated" by force, and we know that a "prolonged quagmire" would be our inevitable destiny.
Attributing
popular and military loyalty solely to "clientelist networks" or the
"fear of reprisals" is a superficial analysis that ignores the deep
connection between the current leadership and the historically excluded masses.
The concept of clientelism is a simplistic label that is foreign to our social
reality.
The
truth is that the poor and excluded sectors identify with the current
leadership because they perceive it as a reflection of their own social
background and historical struggle. The support is not merely a transaction; it
is a profound act of dignification. The population observes the fragmentation
and the internal power struggle within the opposition sectors, which strips
them of popular credibility.
For the
popular masses to feel represented by the opposition, the opposition must
articulate a national project that guarantees real access to opportunities and
education—options that, paradoxically, have been blocked by the very external
sanctions that supposedly seek their "liberation." Popular unity is
sustained by a deep indignation against the aggression that attempts to strip
them of the power and voice they feel they have conquered.
The
view of Venezuela as a mere geopolitical pawn ignores our deep capacity for
cultural adaptation and economic resilience. Despite the blockade and sanctions
that choke access to international financing, the country has entered a process
of de facto economic diversification. The national private sector and
internal production have been forced to grow to counteract external control.
The central problem is not our productive capacity, but the U.S. strategy of
controlling where and how we consume globally.
The
obsession with controlling the lives and economies of other countries is a
reflection of a society that, within its own territory, has lost its ethical
center. The "implicit happiness in being Venezuelan," our capacity to
always seek the best in challenging situations, is an underestimated cultural
factor. Venezuela, a country that once opened its doors to European migrants
fleeing war, feels a profound historical betrayal at the current mistreatment
of its citizens around the world.
Aggression against Venezuela is not the answer. The path forward requires the opposition to manage to capitalize on the loyalties they currently lack through a national project that dignifies the people. The route to the future is peace and dialogue, not the military boot.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario